State v. Harris
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PEAY, Judge.
In June of 1989, the defendant was indict ed on two counts of aggravated rape. At a jury trial he was found guilty of rape and of aggravated rape, receiving Range I concurrent sentences of ten years and twenty-five years respectively.
Bringing this appeal as of right, the defendant raises four issues. He contends that: (1) the trial court improperly denied his motion to appoint to him or to provide funds for the employment of an expert in the field of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) research; (2) the trial court improperly denied his motion in limine to prohibit the State’s…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Graham v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McDaniel v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
- State v. McPhersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.