Legal Opinion

People v. Birch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment of conviction reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted. Memorandum: Under the circumstances before us and in view of the presumption of law that a child under the age of twelve years is not competent to be sworn as a witness (People v. Klein, 266 N. Y. 188), the court was called upon to conduct a proper preliminary examination of the witness to determine whether or not the presumption of disqualification had been overcome. In our opinion the preliminary examination of the nine-year-old complainant was quite inadequate. We also feel that the charge was inadequate in that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. People v. . OdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. People v. KleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. People v. ChurginNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. People v. DernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. KendaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. People v. TisdaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  3. People v. TunstallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. People v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. People v. KibbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API