People v. Tunstall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this first degree murder case, the jury . reported a verdict of guilty with a recommendation of life imprisonment, and the defendant was sentenced for life.
The defendant claims, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We shall consider this first.
The evidence was wholly circumstantial and must therefore be analyzed and considered under the long-established rule set forth in People v. Taddio (292 N. Y. 488, 489): “ Concededly the defendant’s conviction rests upon circumstantial evidence — a process of decision by which a court or jury may reason…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- People v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980