Legal Opinion

People v. Tunstall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

In this first degree murder case, the jury . reported a verdict of guilty with a recommendation of life imprisonment, and the defendant was sentenced for life.

The defendant claims, among other things, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. We shall consider this first.

The evidence was wholly circumstantial and must therefore be analyzed and considered under the long-established rule set forth in People v. Taddio (292 N. Y. 488, 489): “ Concededly the defendant’s conviction rests upon circumstantial evidence — a process of decision by which a court or jury may reason…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. People v. . GalboNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. People v. . FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API