Legal Opinion

Sharples v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 14, 1976No. 63-73PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

In this income tax refund suit plaintiff seeks a 1966 deduction for legal expenses incurred while resisting a Venezuelan tax deficiency. The potential Venezuelan tax liability devolved on plaintiff as the recipient of assets from a liquidated corporation that would have incurred the tax. The issue comes before the court for resolution based upon the parties’ stipulation of facts pursuant to Ct. Cl. Rule 134(b) (2). We *512hold that plaintiff is entitled to deduct the 'legal expenses under the provisions of subsection 212(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.1

As stipulated, Philip Sharpies…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Arrowsmith v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. United States v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robert C. Honodel and Claire E. Honodel v. Commissioner of the Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. AM Properties Corp. v. GTE Products Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  3. Airmotive Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Hendricks v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Meersman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API