Legal Opinion

Beyer v. Bank of America

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 2, 2011No. CV 10-523-MOPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, District Judge.

Jon and Shelley Beyer bring this suit to prevent foreclosure of their home. They have moved for a temporary restraining order [75] arguing that the chain of title is broken. The defendant financial institutions have moved to dismiss the claim for failure to state a claim [67]. Because I find that the Beyers’ claims lack legal merit, I deny their motion for a temporary restraining order and grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

In June 2006, Jon Beyer accepted a loan for $196,000 to purchase a home in St. Helens, Oregon. He executed an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. United States Nat. Bank v. HoltonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. West v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Edelstein v. Bank of New York MellonNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Brandrup v. Recontrust Co., N.A.Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. James v. ReconTrust Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  5. Reeves v. Recontrust Co., N.A.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API