Viafax Corp. v. Stuckenbrock
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
The principal issue presented by this case is whether the plaintiffs motion to set aside a default judgment on the defendant’s counterclaim should have been granted where the counterclaim was filed but not served, and the default judgment entered, after the plaintiffs attorney had withdrawn and the plaintiff had failed to make an appearance through new counsel. We conclude that the plaintiff showed grounds for relief from the judgment, but we affirm the denial of the motion to vacate the judgment because the motion was not filed within a reasonable time.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. HallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stoner v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Shelton v. Diamond International Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Sherwood & Roberts, Inc. v. RiplingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meyers v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Pizzuto v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- Cuevas v. BarrazaIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Fisher Systems Leasing, Inc. v. J & J Gunsmithing & Weaponry Design, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- Araiza v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.