Legal Opinion

Maldjian v. Bloomquist

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 2016No. 15-697PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

*223 Charles R. Bloomquist, Caroline Bloomquist, Sidney Hawes, and Kate Hawes (defendants) appeal from the trial court's order granting Joseph A. Maldjian and Mariana Maldjian's (plaintiffs) motion to compel production of Exhibit A and Exhibit B. Plaintiffs attempt to cross-appeal part of the trial court's order denying plaintiffs' motion to compel production of Exhibit C. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs' purported cross-appeal and a motion for sanctions. Consistent with defendants' motion, we dismiss plaintiffs' cross-appeal but we deny defendants' motion for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Evans v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maldjian v. BloomquistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. Mathis v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. Reynolds Am. Inc. v. Third Motion Equities Master Fund Ltd.North Carolina Business Court · 2018
  4. Steele v. KennaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API