Legal Opinion

In re Eisenberg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 24, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

This is the return of an order to show cause why some of the creditors of a lunatic should not be restrained from prosecuting certain actions at law now pending in the courts of the State of Maryland .against the committee of the person and estate of the alleged bankrupt, wherein the sum of $800 belonging to the estate of the alleged bankrupt has been attached.

The committee, Abraham H. Eisenberg, who was appointed by order of the Supreme Court of this state on the 23rd day of July, 1902, filed the petition in bankruptcy on behalf of the lunatic, and an ex parte…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Application of OtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Matter of StrasburgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Kent v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Pharis v. . GereNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re ZawiszaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re MurrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
  3. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
  4. In Re ClintonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1930
  5. In re KehlerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API