Legal Opinion

Moat v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 28, 1955PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Chief Justice.

Petitioner applied for writ of habeas corpus on grounds that the judgment and two year sentence imposed upon him was void because imposed under Section 843.11, F.S.1951, F.S.A., whereas the information was drawn under Section 843.12, F.S.1951, F.S.A. The writ was issued.

Respondent has .filed a return asserting that the matters raised in this petition have been heretofore judicially determined by this Court on February 1, 1955, in a previous proceedings in habeas corpus.. In support thereof there.is attached to the return certified copies of notice for writ of habeas corpus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State Ex Rel. McCrorySupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Cooper v. SinclairSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  3. D'Alessandro v. Tippins, SheriffSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Pope v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Durley v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Buss v. ReichmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Hitson v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Boyd v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API