Legal Opinion

Hitson v. Mayo

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 28, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Chief Justice..Petitioner,, Irvin Hitson, applied for writ of habeas Corpus on grounds that the judgment and five year sentence imposed upon him was void because imposed under Section 843.11, F.S.1951, F.S.A., whereas the information was drawn under Section 843.-12, F.S.1951, F.S.A. We issued the writ.

Respondent has filed a return alleging that the present detention of petitioner is under a judgment and five: year sentence of the Criminal Court of Record of Hills-borough County, entered March 16, 1953, and that serving of this sentence with gain time deducted ’ could not expire until…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pope v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. Moat v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Gorman v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Alderman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  4. Hitson v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Beckley v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API