Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from decree of chancery court of city of Richmond, rendered February 7th, 1889, in a cause entitled “ Johnson et al. against Whitlock et al.” The decree being adverse to the complainants, they appealed. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Hinton,

J., delivered the opinion of the court.

After a careful examination of this record, we find that the opinion of the learned chancellor, the late Hon. Edward H. Eitzhugh, who decided the case in the court below, and whose opinion is made a part of the record, so clearly expresses the views of this court that we adopt it as our own.

That opinion reads as follows :

“Prom the pleadings and evidence in this cause it appears that in June, 1853, Dr. Carter P. Johnson, the ancestor of the plaintiff, bought at a judicial sale the lots No. 25, 26 and 27, which are the subjects of this controversy.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Creekmur v. CreekmurSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  2. Effinger v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
  3. Hurt v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  4. Langyher v. Patterson & BashSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  5. Terry v. Coles' Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chapman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Normant v. Eureka Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Shirley v. Van EverySupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. Tidball v. Shenandoah National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. Virginia Midland Railroad v. Barbour & JeffriesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API