Legal Opinion

Acevedo v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant City of Philadelphia (the “City”) and the Cross-motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Robert Acevedo. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiffs Motion is denied in its entirety.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1

A. General Background of Regulation 32

This action focuses on the operation of Philadelphia Civil Service Regulation 32 (“Regulation 32” or the “Regulation”) and its alleged discriminatory…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reyer v. Saint Francis Country HouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Dougherty v. Cable News NetworkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  3. LEHENKY v. TOSHIBA AMERICA ENERGY SYSTEMS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Maria Bleak v. Providence Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. THOMAS v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API