Nortman v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his action for declaratory and injunctive relief in which he seeks, as a taxpayer, to prevent the claimed illegal expenditure of public funds by the City of Portland (city) for the construction of a covered play area at Chapman School. The motion to dismiss was based, inter alia, on plaintiffs failure to plead ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. Our review is limited to the sufficiency of the complaint. Because we decide that the dismissal for failure to state a claim was correct, we do not reach the other issues presented.
In his complaint,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Collins v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Davidson v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Chemical Waste Storage & Disposition, Inc. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nortman v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988