Legal Opinion

Nortman v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1988No. A8608-05027; CA A44659PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his action for declaratory and injunctive relief in which he seeks, as a taxpayer, to prevent the claimed illegal expenditure of public funds by the City of Portland (city) for the construction of a covered play area at Chapman School. The motion to dismiss was based, inter alia, on plaintiffs failure to plead ultimate facts sufficient to constitute a claim. Our review is limited to the sufficiency of the complaint. Because we decide that the dismissal for failure to state a claim was correct, we do not reach the other issues presented.

In his complaint,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Collins v. FitzwaterOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lincoln Loan Co. v. State, State Highway Com'nOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Davidson v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Chemical Waste Storage & Disposition, Inc. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nortman v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API