Chemical Waste Storage & Disposition, Inc. v. Day
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing plaintiff’s amended complaint after an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer. The trial court set forth as its reason for sustaining the demurrer “that defendants are immune.” A demurrer properly raises the issue *517of inmranity. Smith v. Cooper, 256 Or 485, 488, 475 P2d 78, 45 ALR3d 857 (1970).
The amended complaint sets forth the following facts, which for demurrer purposes are assumed to be true.
Plaintiff is an Oregon corporation doing business in Oregon. Defendant Day is the Director of the Department of Environmental Quality. Defendant Mann is the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Antin v. Union High School District No. 2Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Jarrett v. WillsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Utley v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Coblentz v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Donahue v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Dickens v. DeBoltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Disney-Marine Co., Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.