Price v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
Vernon Price contends that his conviction of two counts of burglary should be reversed because of the trial court’s failure to give a mandatory instruction relating to accomplice testimony. We find that the court’s failure to give the instruction rendered Price’s trial fundamentally unfair and constitutes a miscarriage of justice, and thus, we reverse the conviction and remand the case for further proceédings.
On October 13, 1972, Vernon Jones, Phillip Smilie, and Vernon Price were indicted on two counts of burglary in a dwelling in violation of former AS 11.20.080. 1…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Nathaniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Bishop v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.