MD II ENTERTAINMENT, INC. v. City of Dallas, Tex.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MALONEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are the Motions for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs and the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant. The motions are opposed. After considering the motions, the responses, and the reply, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs’ motions should be granted and Defendant’s motion denied.
This action is a consolidation of several actions brought by existing businesses featuring female striptease against the City of Dallas. Plaintiffs challenge the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baby Dolls Topless Saloons, Inc. v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- N.W. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Baby Dolls Topless Saloons, Inc. v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
- Vaughn v. St. Helena Parish Police JuryDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2002
- Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts v. Texas BLC, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.