Legal Opinion · Dissent

Detroit Police Officers Association v. Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1996No. Docket Nos. 103592, 103610, Calendar No. 7Published

1DissentRiley, J.

i

In a relatively short opinion, the majority concludes that

[t]he issue presented by this case is whether the parties’ past practice is so widely acknowledged and mutually accepted that it amends the contradictory and unambiguous contract language in the collective bargaining agreement. Applying the majority’s analysis and holding in the recently decided Port Huron Ed Ass’n v Port Huron Area School Dist, 452 Mich 309; 550 NW2d 228 (1996), we hold that the association has shown that the parties had a meeting of the minds with respect to the new terms or conditions and that the past practice was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Port Huron Education Ass'n v. Port Huron Area School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. DETROIT FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOC. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Smith v. Lansing School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API