Legal Opinion
Ross v. University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 1989No. C8-88-2449PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
James Ross, M.D., commenced an action after being dismissed from the University of Minnesota’s psychiatry residency program. Ross sought injunctive and declaratory relief, and damages for the University’s alleged breach of an “employment” contract, for denial of his substantive and procedural due process rights, for infliction of emotional distress, and for defamation. The trial court granted summary judgment dismissing his complaint against the University, and Ross appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
Dr. James Ross joined the University of Minnesota’s psychiatry residency program on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gupta v. New Britain General HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Doe v. University of St. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Gul v. Center for Family MedicineSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Rollins v. Cardinal Stritch UniversityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Hernandez v. Overlook HospitalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.