Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. Town of Lake Lure

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 2008No. COA07-728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Appeal of an interlocutory order that fails to dispose of all claims against all parties is premature and must be dismissed.

Factual and Procedural Background

“The procedural quagmire that confronts us here is best unraveled by a chronological account of the proceedings in the trial court[s].” Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 206, 270 S.E.2d 431, 432 (1980). On 24 April 2002 plaintiff filed an action in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina against the Town of Lake Lure (“Town”) and others. Her amended complaint asserted four causes of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Harris v. MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christenbury Eye Ctr., P.A. v. Medflow, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. ALLEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGSDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  3. Cary Creek Ltd. Partnership v. Town of CaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Cary Creek Ltd. Partnership v. Town of CaryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Estate of Mills v. Estate of MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API