Legal Opinion

In re Disbarment of Bloor

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Proceeding for the disbarment of John Bloor.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. ■

— The respondent, John Bloor, was convicted of a felony. The conviction was sustained by the court on Bloor’s appeal. (See State v. Bloor, 20 Mont. 574, 52 Pac. 611. After the remittitur from this court was forwarded to the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for Lewis and Clarke county, in which respondent was convicted, the clerk of said District Court, pursuant to the provisons of Section 417 of the Code of Civil Procedure, transmitted to this court a certified copy of the record of conviction. The respondent’s counsel now before this court objects to our…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BloorMontana Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DiGenova v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ReamerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. In Re PetersMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In re WellcomeMontana Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API