Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Wilson v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 16, 1949PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSeawell, J.
Three civil actions to recover for personal injuries sustained in motor vehicle collision allegedly caused by actionable negligence of defendants.
The several plaintiffs allege in their respective complaints as acts of negligence proximately causing the collision between the automobile which they were riding and the said tractor and trailer, that defendants (1) "left said truck and trailer standing upon the paved portion of the highway when it was practical to park or leave said truck or trailer off the main traveled portion of the highway, while unattended and when there was not a clear and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Tarrant Ex Rel. Tarrant v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cox v. Hennis Freight LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Clark v. ScheldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Burchette v. DAVIS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY OF DURHAMSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Beasley v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Bumgardner v. AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.