Legal Opinion

Gray v. Staley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 4, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-0937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge

Before the court is Plaintiff Linwood Gray’s “Rule 60(b)(2) Motion Predicated on a Valid Request for Judicial Notice 201(c)(2) That is Germane to the Pending Case” (“Rule 60(b)(2) Motion”). Pl.’s Mot. for Relief from J., EOF No. 65 [hereinafter PL’s Mot.]. The court may consider the motion, even though this matter is on appeal. See Hoai v. Vo, 936 F.2d 308, 312 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (stating that “the District Court may consider the 60(b) motion” simultaneously with appellate review).

Plaintiffs Rule 60(b)(2) Motion is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Juan A. Delgado, Juan A. Delgado v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Duckworth v. US EX REL. LOCKEDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. West v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cato Institute v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API