Legal Opinion

Buffolino v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly denied, as untimely, the summary judgment motion of the defendant Stephanie Cho, which was made returnable six days beyond the deadline fixed by the Supreme Court in a so-ordered stipulation dated November 30, 2010, as she failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay (see CPLR 2004, 3212 [a]; Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648, 652 [2004]; Van Dyke v Skanska USA Civ. Northeast, Inc., 83 AD3d 1049 [2011]).

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the parties’ *634remaining contentions. Florio, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Van Dyke v. Skanska USA Civil Northeast, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arcamone-Makinano v. Britton Property, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Garcia v. Bleeker St. Gardens, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Giuliano v. 666 Old Country Road, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Giuliano v. 666 Old Country Road, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. St. John's University v. Butler Rogers Baskett Architects, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API