United States v. R. C. Boeckel & Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; Frederic Dodge, Judge. "Information by the United States against R. C. Boeckel & Co. and another. Judgment for defendants, and the United States brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BINGITAM, Circuit Judge.
This is an information by the United States against 131 boxes of confectionery, a part of which had been transported into Massachusetts from New York and a part from Pennsylvania. It was brought under section 10 of the Food and Drugs Act of June 30, 1906 (34 Stat. at Earge, p. 768, c. 3915 [Comp. St. 1913, § 8726]), for the purpose of seizing and condemning the confectionery on the ground that it contained talc, and was therefore adulterated within the meaning of section 7 of the act. A warrant having issued, the marshal seized 104 boxes of the confectionary, that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- State v. SchlenkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Commonwealth v. SchaffnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1896
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Penobscot Poultry Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- United States v. CowenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- United States v. Lo CurtoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929