State v. Schlenker
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polh District Court. — Hon C. A. Bisiiop, Judge. Dependant was convicted of tbe crime of selling adulterated milk. His motion in arrest of judgment, based on the proposition that the statute is unconstitutional, was sustained, and he was released, and his bond exonerated. From this order the state appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
1 *6442 *643The statute under which the information was filed reads as follows: “If any person shall sell * * any adulterated * * * milk * * * he shall be fined,” etc. Section 4989. Section 4990 reads, “For the purpose of this chapter the addition of water or any other substance or thing, to whole milk or skimmed milk or partly skimmed milk, is hereby declared an adulteration,” etc. There is no question that defendant sold milk to various persons into which he had put and mixed boracie acid. Some of them were notified of the adulteration, *644but others were not. He testifies that he dissolved 5 pounds of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Kidd v. PearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hutchinson Ice Cream Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- City of St. Louis v. LiessingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- People v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Bossmiller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.