Legal Opinion

Eastep v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 1950No. 15198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FI ALL, Justice.

There was one special issue submitted to the jury in this workmen’s compensation case, to-wit:

“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that, on July 14, 1949, the Freedman Iron & Supply Company and the W. Silver Company were not engaged in a ‘joint venture’ in salvage operations at the Sinclair Refinery, under an agreement between them?”, to which the jury answered: “They were not engaged in a joint venture.”

The trial court rendered judgment non obstante veredicto for the insurance carrier, appellee herein.

Appellants’ three points consist of an over-all complaint to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Le Master v. Fort Worth Transit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Holcomb v. LorinoTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Donald v. PhillipsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Burr v. GreenlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Vines v. Harry Newton, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Fuller v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API