Munnally v. Board of Education
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Arpead by the plaintiff from a judgment, rendered, in favor of the defendant in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, seventh district, borough of Manhattan.
1Per curiam
The position of teacher of gymnastics, which plaintiff’s assignor held at the time of his appointment as attendance officer, made him a mere employee of the hoard of education, and not an officer of the city (Steinson v. Board of Education, 165 N. Y. 431), and herein the ease at bar differs from McAdam v. Mayor, 36 Hun, 340, and Fitch v. Mayor, 40 id. 512. McAdam was a clerk of a bureau in the finance department and, therefore, directly within the language of section 59 of the Consolidation Act, and in the Bitch ease the learned justice writing the opinion is at much pains to demonstrate that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Steinson v. . Bd. of Education of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- In re ClampNew York Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cooke v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Shlakman v. Board of Higher EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Gelson v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Blum v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908