Commonwealth v. Howlett
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*192Opinion of the Court by
Justice CUNNINGHAM.
The Commonwealth, pursuant to Section 115 of the Constitution of Kentucky and CR 76.37(10), petitions this Court for certification of the law regarding the limitations of judicial notice. Specifically, the Commonwealth seeks certification of the law on the following question:
In light of KRE 201’s pre-Rules case law and its current Federal equivalent, what if any special prohibitions exist in a bench trial against the use of a judge’s taking judicial notice of a fact that comes from the judge’s personal knowledge given KRE 201’s silence on the matter ?
T…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Berber-TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Shapleigh v. MierSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Gray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jeffrey Pettingill v. Sara Yount PettingillKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
- Rogers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Stephen Marchese v. Allison AebersoldKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. HowlettKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Jeffrey Pettingill v. Sara Yount PettingillKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.