In Re the Custody of Orr
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Respondent assigns three errors, namely: (1) the refusal of the court to dismiss the action in accordance with his motion made on his special appearance; (2) the refusal of the court to continue the hearing and make further investigation with respect to the fitness of petitioner and respondent to have custody of the children; (3) signing the judgment awarding custody of the children to petitioner.
Respondent does not challenge by exception any of the findings of fact made by the court. Findings of fact made in the custody proceeding, when supported by competent evidence, are conclusive on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Boardman v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Digirogio v. DigirogioSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Maloney v. MaloneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Miller v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Owenby v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Adams v. TessenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Wilburn v. WilburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Dees v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Dees v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.