Legal Opinion

Effler v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided January 17, 1934No. Docket No. 50160Published

1Opinion of the Court

*794OPINION.

McMahon:

We are here called upon to determine whether the respondent erred in including in the taxable income of the petitioner for the year 1926 the amount of $60,000 constituting a part of the amount of $285,533.33. This item of $285,533.33 is the aggregate of amounts which were actually paid by certain trusts to the partnership of Smith, Baker, Effler & Eastman in the year 1926, and constituted either fees to Smith and Baker, two of the members of the partnership, for their services as trustees, or such trustees’ fees and, in addition, fees to the partnership for legal services. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Mesta Machine Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  5. Cleveland R. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API