Legal Opinion
Amcast Industrial Corporation and Elkhart Products Corporation v. Detrex Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 10, 1995No. 94-2026PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Chief Judge.
This is a sequel to the decision of the same panel reported at 2 F.3d 746 (7th Cir.1993), in which we largely affirmed a judgment that the district court had entered in December of 1992 declaring that Detrex Corporation was liable to the plaintiffs for “response costs” under the Superfund statute, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(g)(2), and that these response costs included the attorneys’ fees that the plaintiffs had incurred to establish Detrex’s liability. No assessment of attorneys’ fees had yet been made, however. More than a year later — -March 1994 — the district court entered an…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Satinder S. Rekhi v. Wildwood Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Yaroslav Sklyarsky v. Means-Knaus PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Roboserve, Inc. v. Kato Kagaku Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Salovaara v. EckertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.