Legal Opinion
First National Bank & Trust Co. of Enid v. Holston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 28, 1976No. 49404PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Vice Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the entry of deficiency judgment against the debtor after the secured creditor conducted a private sale of secured interest in the collateral. The trial court found the parties had stipulated that the form of notice of sale was proper 1 and in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, 12A O.S.1971 § 9-504(3). 2 The only controversy on appeal is whether the secured creditor conducted the sale of the secured interest in the collateral in a commercially reasonable manner.
Van A. Halston, d/b/a Morris Foods, appellant, “debtor,”…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tarrant Savings Association v. Lucky Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- DeLay First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Jacobson Appliance Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
- Oilwell Division, United States Steel Corp. v. FryerTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Co. v. RoneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- In Re Zsa Zsa LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- FMA Financial Corp. v. Pro-PrintersUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. MaryanskiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
- In the Matter of Excello Press, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Metlife Capital Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Mount Vernon Dodge, Inc. v. Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.