State v. Tisa Farrow
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. This case calls upon us to consider the admissibility of evidence of defendant’s decision not to complete a field sobriety exercise as requested by a police officer in the context of an answer to a question we left open in a prior decision: Under the Vermont Constitution, is a defendant’s refusal or failure to perform voluntary field sobriety exercises admissible if the defendant was not advised at the time of the refusal that evidence of a refusal to perform the exercises may be admissible in court? We conclude that the refusal evidence is admissible without regard to whether police…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PelicanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BlaisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Shannon Rajda / State v. Albert Lee Lape, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- State v. Theodore Dmitri ColehamerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- State of Iowa v. Jose Manuel Cruz OrdonezCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
- State of Vermont v. Christopher FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025