Legal Opinion

Imo Oil & Gas Co. v. Knox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 14, 1931No. 19764PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This action was instituted by Charles E. Knox against the Imo Oil & Gas Company, and based upon malicious prosecution of a civil action. On May 31, 1922, the Empire Gas & Fuel Company owned an oil and gas lease on a quarter section of land in Garfield county. R. E. Hoy owned the fee. On January 18, 1924, Hoy secured a judgment canceling the lease in part on the ground of nondevelopment. The Empire Company had developed a small producing well on the premises, so the decree of cancellation reserved unto the Empire Company approximately ten acres about the well. The Empire Company assigned to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schonwald v. RagainsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Munns v. De NemoursU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania · 1811
  3. Stalker v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. El Reno Gas & Electric Co. v. SpurgeonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Sawyer v. ShickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wayne Kitchens v. Bryan County National BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  2. Park v. Security Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Frank Chavez v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York Corporation, Rolando Garza Zarate v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. Jurkowski v. CrawleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Ladonna Brown and Craig Brown v. Skaggs-Albertson's Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API