Legal Opinion

Coll v. Franco (In re Franco)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico

Decided February 28, 2018No. Case No. 03–13492 tr7; Case No. 13–12941 tr7; Adv. No. 17–1001 tPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

David T. Thuma, United States Bankruptcy Judge

Before the Court is the chapter 7 trustee's motion to dismiss the counterclaims of Carla Franco and Drennan, Langdon, and Fidel, LLP, under, inter alia, the Barton doctrine and quasi-judicial immunity. The motion has been fully briefed. After reviewing the relevant law, the Court concludes that Counts Two, Three, and Four of the counterclaims should be dismissed.

I. ALLEGATIONS

For the limited purpose of ruling on the trustee's motion to dismiss, the Court accepts the following allegations as true:1

By warranty deeds recorded in Book 251, Pg. 295…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dean L Horton and Frances H HortonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API