Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkansas State Board of Licensure for Professional Engineers & Professional Surveyors v. Callicott

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 19, 2016No. CV-15-1039Published

1DissentWaymond M. Brown, Judge

I strongly disagree with the majority’s decision to reverse and remand for the Board to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law, as the findings and conclusions are sufficiently clear to determine the basis for the Board’s decision to revoke the surveyor’s license of Callicott.

The majority correctly states that the Arkansas Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires that an administrative adjudication be accompanied by specific findings of fact and conclusions of law. Ark. Code Ann. § 25-15-210 (Repl. 2014). The APA further states the following: 2(2) A final decision shall…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Arkansas State Board of Physical TherapySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'n Board v. Central Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Olsten Health Services, Inc. v. Arkansas Health Services CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Hester v. Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing BoardCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API