Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Tucker

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1907Published

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

This is an action brought for the fore closure of a mechanic’s lien. Mechanics' liens áre alleged to have been filed against the premises of the defendant *465Coffin, Hos. 166-172 Perry street, in chronological order by the defendant Wight-Easton-Townsend Company for $10,525.80, the plaintiff Hurley for $9,305.37, the Empire Brick & Supply Co. for $4,397.71, the defendant Morrow for $1,000, the Pelham Operating Co. for $803, the defendant Stockinger for $820, the defendant Hnion Construction & Waterproofing Co. for $650, the defendant John Kane & Co. for $2,059.10, the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Toop v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Mahley v. . German BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Armstrong v. ChisolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Martin v. Ambrose A. Gavigan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API