Hyde v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana; George M. Bourquin, Judge. . . Suit in equity by the Minerals. Separation, Limited, and the Minerals Separation American Syndicate, Limited, against James M. Hyde. Decree for complainants, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the decree of the court below sustaining letters patent No. 835,120, issued to Sul-man, Picard, and'Ballot, on November 6, 1906, and assigned to Minerals Separation, Limited, and Minerals Separation American Syndicate, Limited, adjudging the appellant herein to have infringed the same, and enjoining further infringement. The patent is for new and useful improvements in ore concentration. Its object is to separate metalliferous matter from gangue, by means' of oils and fatty acids which have a preferential affinity for metalliferous matter. In the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Naylor v. Alsop Process Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miami Copper Co. v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Metals Recovery Co. v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Copper Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1916
- Wolf Mineral Process Corp. v. Mineral Separation North American Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1925
- Butte & Superior Mining Co. v. Minerals Separation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.