Legal Opinion

Garsick v. Dehner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1944No. 31740PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court for Douglas county decreeing specific performance of a written real estate purchase contract. Appellant, hereinafter called defendant, contends that the judgment of the trial court is contrary to the law and the evidence; that the contract lacks mutuality; that plaintiff’s conduct in its inducement precludes the aid of equity; and that a mistake in the matter of consideration to be paid avoids specific performance of the contract. We find that these contentions are without merit.

An examination of the record discloses that defendant is a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bennett v. MoonNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Clarke v. KoenigNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bauer v. BauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Beard v. MorganNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. BextenNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hecker v. Ravenna BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Superior Oil Co. v. Devon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. School District of Scottsbluff v. Olson Const. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. De Los Santos v. Great Western Sugar Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Pacific Royalty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API