Legal Opinion
Fenstermaker v. City of Dayton, Ohio
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 17, 1988No. C-3-87-532PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS CARLENE NAVARRE, CAROL PAULEY, BARBARA BENT AND THE CITY OF DAYTON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #6); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED FOR SAID DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF; DECISION AND ENTRY DISMISSING, SUA SPONTE, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF DAYTON AS A PARTY DEFENDANT FOR THE REASON THAT SAID DEFENDANT IS NOT A SUA-BLE ENTITY; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
The captioned cause came on to be heard upon the Motion of the Defendants, City of Dayton, the Police Department of the City of Dayton, Officer Carlene…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Teresa Tysinger v. Police Department of the City of ZanesvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Teresa Tysinger v. Police Department of the City of ZanesvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Tysinger v. Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006