Young v. Brown
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In considering a motion to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the allegations in the complaint should be accepted as true, and the motion should be granted only if the facts as alleged do not fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Rietschel v Maimonides Med. Ctr., 83 AD3d 810 [2011]; Peterec-Tolino v Harap, 68 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2009]).
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action against the defendants *762David H. Brown, Hindsight Biblical…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Marmelstein v. Kehillat New HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ferrandino & Son, Inc. v. Wheaton Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Coopersmith v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Langford v. Roman Catholic DioceseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.