Legal Opinion

Gasper v. Department of Social & Health Services

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 7, 2006No. 33088-1-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.

¶1 The Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) recently implemented the “shared living *46rule,”1 which reduces the number of home care hours it will fund for clients who live with their paid caregivers. DSHS believed this rule was consistent with the policies of not paying for services that benefit the entire household and of not paying for services that other support mechanisms already provide. Venetta Gasper and Tommye Myers, disabled Medicaid recipients living with their paid caregivers, challenged the reduction in their care hours. The trial court invalidated the shared living rule,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. DSHSWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Jenkins v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Gasper v. DSHSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API