Legal Opinion

M.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 29, 2012No. 4D11-532PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.

The issue presented is whether law enforcement officers had reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk appellant after the report of an armed robbery. We find, based on the specific facts of this case, that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to stop and frisk appellant. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress.

Sergeant Anton of the Davie Police Department was dispatched to an area in reference to an armed robbery. The sergeant later described this area as a “high crime area” known for “robberies, burglaries and narcotics.” The only information he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Hetland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Pantin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  5. Tanner v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jonavon D. Gaines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. State of Florida v. Pharoh JemisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. Arun Rashid Turay v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2023
  4. MM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. STATE OF FLORIDA v. DOUGLAS DALEYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API