Legal Opinion

Gonzalez v. Brayley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously af*1014firmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs, Marilu and Jose L. Gonzalez, each established a triable issue of fact regarding the threshold question of serious injury under section 5102 (d) of the Insurance Law. The affidavit of Marilu’s physician indicating that Marilu suffered from post-traumatic prepatellar bursitis requiring a prolonged period of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication, that she was unable to kneel, and that the bursitis may require surgery, presented an issue of fact whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spezia v. De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Redmond v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Akin v. Estate of PattiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kolios v. ZnackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Boorman v. BowhersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Borino v. LittleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Schmitt v. ReevesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API