Borino v. Little
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentGoldstein, J.
Insurance Law § 5102 (d) sets forth nine specific categories of serious injury. A plaintiff need only establish that his or her injuries fall under one of those categories (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230). Evidence of a significant but not necessarily permanent limitation of use of a body function or system is sufficient (see, Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017). The plaintiff is not required to establish that the limitation precluded him or her from performing usual and customary daily activities (see, Paternoster v Drehmer, 260 AD2d 867).
In support of their motion for summary judgment, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mariaca-Olmos v. MizrhyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Raso v. Statewide Auto Auction Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Paternoster v. DrehmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Perry v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.