Legal Opinion · Dissent

Borino v. Little

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 12, 2000Published

1DissentGoldstein, J.

Insurance Law § 5102 (d) sets forth nine specific categories of serious injury. A plaintiff need only establish that his or her injuries fall under one of those categories (see, Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230). Evidence of a significant but not necessarily permanent limitation of use of a body function or system is sufficient (see, Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017). The plaintiff is not required to establish that the limitation precluded him or her from performing usual and customary daily activities (see, Paternoster v Drehmer, 260 AD2d 867).

In support of their motion for summary judgment, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Mariaca-Olmos v. MizrhyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Raso v. Statewide Auto Auction Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Paternoster v. DrehmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Perry v. PaganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API