Legal Opinion

Aronitz v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*394Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered July 8, 2004, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff, a Canadian resident, instituted this action against the Canadian company she worked for and her supervisor, a Canadian resident, alleging quid pro quo and hostile work environment sexual harassment. The court properly determined that New York’s borrowing statute (CPLR 202), which requires the cause of action brought by a nonresident that accrues outside New York to be timely under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Global Financial Corp. v. Triarc Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Bogoni v. FriedlanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Proctor & Gamble Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. In re ThomasNew York Surrogate's Court · 2010
  3. Delgado v. Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
  4. Venture v. RemillardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API