Legal Opinion
Hodas v. Sherburne, Powers & Needham, P.C.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 16, 1996No. Civil Action 96-10317-GAOPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
In this suit, the plaintiff Martin Hodas alleges civil violations by the defendants of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. The defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint for the reason that the claims are barred by the applicable four-year statute of limitations. The Court grants the motion.
I
The facts as the plaintiff alleges them are as follows: 1 In 1986, Hodas was an active real estate investor living in New York. He became interested in investing in the New England real estate market and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jorge Correa-Martinez v. Rene Arrillaga-BelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. HohriSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Álvarez-MauráS v. Banco Popular of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- Orbusneich Medical Co. v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Bendzak v. Midland National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2006
- Forbes v. EaglesonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Lares Group, II v. TobinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.