Eugene Hayes and Judy Hayes v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The controversy with which we are here concerned is whether the plaintiffs’appellants’ repudiation of a settlement agreement entered into by their attorney on the eve of trial was justified. The attorney represented not only the appellants but also was the attorney for 16 others. In addition to the appellants, Eugene and Judy Hayes, three other members of the group voted against acceptance. The clients and the attorney had entered into a prior agreement that the majority rule would govern acceptance of a settlement, but the appellants and two other plaintiffs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Harris v. Diamond Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Thomas v. Colorado Trust Deed Funds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Hill v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Baumgartner v. WhinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Oaklawn ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United States v. HullumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- Knisley v. City of JacksonvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Augustus v. John Williams & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.