Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. United Pacific Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1994No. 92-4195PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for Heritage Bank and Trust (“Heritage”), filed this action against Defendant United Pacific Insurance Company seeking recovery under two fidelity bonds covering dishonest acts by employees.1 The aggregate liability under the bonds totaled $1,450,000. A jury trial was commenced on June 10, 1992, and after five days of testimony, the jury returned a unanimous special verdict in favor of the FDIC. The jury found that John R. Starley, while an officer of Heritage, committed a dishonest act, with manifest…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Thomas G. Koch v. City of HutchinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- John W. Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Terex Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Mrl Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Eugene B. Kassman v. The American University. Appeal of Lloyd UltanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Myron Durtsche, Jr. v. American Colloid CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- (HC) Montes Regalado v. GarlandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Barrett v. CiolliDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Bealer v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Perkins v. SaipherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.