Legal Opinion

Pelzer v. Geise

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided June 25, 1898No. Nos. 37-89, 41Published

These were four suits instituted by complainant, Pelzer, against different defendants for alleged infringement of a patent for improvements in electrical fixtures. The causes were heard on motions for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The above-stated cases are suits upon reissued letters patent No. 11,478, granted March 12, 1893, to Luther Siieringer, for an improvement in electrical fixtures. The original (No. 259,235) was dated June 6, 1882, and was applied for Mart'll 15, .1882. A motion for a preliminary injunction has been made in each case. These moiioris were argued at the same time, *870and may be disposed, of together. The defenses are not, in some particulars, precisely identical, but the point which has been chiefly relied upon is common to all the cases, and presents the only question which,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maitland v. B. Goetz Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. Maitland v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
  3. Maitland v. Archer & Pancoast Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API